{"id":27,"date":"2005-02-26T18:41:14","date_gmt":"2005-02-26T18:41:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ladle\/wordpress\/?p=27"},"modified":"2025-10-13T00:40:57","modified_gmt":"2025-10-12T23:40:57","slug":"jeebobojofee","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fumblings.com\/weblog\/?p=27","title":{"rendered":"Lego Language in the Garden of Eden"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After yesterday&#8217;s stark, awful entry (only to those UK residents with CFS\/ME, maybe), I&#8217;ve been trying to get less anxious by diverting my tiny brain. I tried looking at pictures of kittens on the internet, but it didn&#8217;t really work, so while talking about nonsense with a <a href=\"http:\/\/eagerglee.blogspot.com\/\">friend of mine<\/a> on MSN, I decided to just get really silly playing with the terminology thing and see where it would go.  Let&#8217;s pretend we&#8217;re in the Garden of Eden, and we want to say who we are, and what we like. If I can express states of biological sex vs internal gender identity with terms like <a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2005\/02\/because_we_shou.html\">jeebo and beejo<\/a>, why not have an optional attachment to be able to succinctly state your sexual preference?<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"bricktest3smal.jpg\" src=\"\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/bricktest3smal.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" vspace=\"10\" hspace=\"10\" align=\"left\" \/> Again, I stress that the point of this isn&#8217;t <em>just<\/em> silly wordplay: I&#8217;m trying to find ways to scratch the current categories of words, which can be misleading, and express important facets of human nature in the simple most elemental terms, like <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lego.com\">Lego<\/a>. It&#8217;s playing with bricks, yes, but might illuminate why I feel uncomfortable with the current set of labels, or if I&#8217;m just being picky.<\/p>\n<p>So let&#8217;s play with some bricks: what if you&#8217;re a girl-in-a-boy-body (g-i-b-o &#8211; &#8220;<strong>jeebo<\/strong>&#8220;) and you like boys?  Then you&#8217;re a <strong>jeebobo<\/strong>.<br \/>\nWhat if you&#8217;re a non-transgendered man, who&#8217;s straight? Then you&#8217;re a <strong>beebojo<\/strong>. What if you&#8217;re a bisexual transman? <strong>beejobojo<\/strong>. You could even use the order of the suffix to order your bisexual preference, if you wanted: <strong>-bojo<\/strong> if you tended towards men, and <strong>-jobo<\/strong> if the reverse. Or I guess <strong>beejobi<\/strong> if you really didn&#8217;t want to express a preference, loathe as I am to use <em>any<\/em> previous terminology, as we&#8217;re imagining here we&#8217;re children in the Garden of Eden, starting with language again. So I&#8217;m going to use -bojo and -jobo interchangeably.<\/p>\n<p>Pushing a little further, imagine a world where we think freely enough about gender\/body variance that people differentiate between whether they are attracted to particularly-sexed bodies, which might be at variance to their preference for the mind contained therein. Some people are attracted to transgendered people. This is easy to incorporate too. If you&#8217;re a biological and gender-identified woman who is attracted to FtM transpeople, you&#8217;d be a <strong>jeejobeejo<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>What about if you&#8217;re a transperson who&#8217;s had surgery? Then I guess you can define yourself in relation to your body as you see it. If you&#8217;ve always identified as a woman but were born in a male body, you were a <strong>jeebo<\/strong> at birth; if you subsequently changed your body sufficiently that you feel it identifies as female, you can call yourself a <strong>jeejo<\/strong> now. It depends on what your stance is on whether hormones, chromosomes or sexual organs define a body&#8217;s physical sex. It really doesn&#8217;t matter, and gets rid of the monolith of gender=sex. And you actually <em>could<\/em> go onto <a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2005\/01\/jerry_springer_1.html\">Jerry Springer<\/a> and say &#8220;Hi Jerry, I used to be a jeebo but now I&#8217;m a jeejo&#8221;. If you were a masochist. That&#8217;d flummox him.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"legolove.jpg\" src=\"\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/legolove.jpg\" widt h=\"298\" height=\"205\" vspace=\"10\" hspace=\"10\" align=\"right\" \/><\/p>\n<p>I presume most of my readers are <strong>beebojos<\/strong> and <strong>jeejobos<\/strong> so I can imagine your patience may be wearing thin. I&#8217;ll add one more qualification to really walk a tightrope, for fun. In genderqueer circles in the US, being butch or femme seems to be becoming more of a conscious identity badge too, so to really push this to extremes, you could add a third suffix to express this: <strong>-fee<\/strong> and <strong>-boo<\/strong>. An example: if you were a FtM transperson who is attracted to biological girls, and sees herself as femme, you&#8217;d be a <strong>beejojofee<\/strong>. If you were a butch gay man you&#8217;d be a <strong>beeboboboo<\/strong>. I think the last word is possibly my favourite.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;d love to make a website where you could tick boxes as to your physical sex, gender identity, sexual orientation and femme\/butchness which would then punch out an icon for your website, but I&#8217;m too stupid to make one. If anyone wants to help please say!<\/p>\n<p>The other point you&#8217;ll have noticed is that precedence is important here, so you don&#8217;t confuse your jee&#8217;s bo&#8217;s and fee&#8217;s. It&#8217;s dead simple. Just as it is on the <a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2005\/01\/an_angels_map_t.html\">map in the human heart<\/a>, the most central important concepts come first. The order is:<\/p>\n<p><em>[gender-identity][body][sexual-preference][gender-roleness]<\/em><\/p>\n<p>And of course in most cases you&#8217;ll only need to use the first two, (or even one?), so you&#8217;ll say to your Edenite friend when she calls you &#8220;he&#8221;, &#8220;oh, actually I&#8217;m a jeebo&#8221;, at which point, she&#8217;ll laugh, apologise and share an apple with you.<\/p>\n<p>I feel I should leave a set of exercises with multiple choice questions for the reader like instructional books do at the end of each chapter. &#8220;What would you call a bisexual transwoman who identifies as butch and is attracted to mainly women?&#8221;. First one to answer this one in a comment gets a gold star! It&#8217;s remarkably easy to construct these terms when you get used to it, and a whole lot easier than leaving a messy syntactically complicated sentence to express your identity should you need to at a cocktail party.<\/p>\n<p>I think this <strong>jeebobojofee<\/strong>&#8216;s said enough.<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"bricktestamentsmall.png\" src=\"\/weblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/bricktestamentsmall.png\" width=\"300\" height=\"206\" vspace=\"10\" hspace=\"10\" \/><\/div>\n<p class=\"smaller\">\nAfterword: it comes as no small surprise having written this that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.co.uk\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/1931686459\/qid=1109442298\/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl\/026-5395301-6794030\">this book<\/a> exists: I&#8217;m happy to give it some publicity in return for images. Apparently it&#8217;s a <a href=\"http:\/\/flakmag.com\/features\/bricktest.html\">bit controversial<\/a>. The author is quoted as saying &#8220;And while it may strike some people as odd that God called on an atheist to illustrate the Bible in Lego, remember that Moses was a murderer before he was called, and Paul a persecutor of Christians. So by comparison, I&#8217;m practically a saint.&#8221; His website, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thebricktestament.com\/\">The Brick Testament<\/a> is fun, and hardly more profane than the supposedly sacred and downright terrifying <a href=\"http:\/\/members.aol.com\/JesusImages\/\">With You Always<\/a> site.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After yesterday&#8217;s stark, awful entry (only to those UK residents with CFS\/ME, maybe), I&#8217;ve been trying to get less anxious by diverting my tiny brain. I tried looking at pictures of kittens on the internet, but it didn&#8217;t really work, so while talking about nonsense with a friend of mine on MSN, I decided to &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/fumblings.com\/weblog\/?p=27\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Lego Language in the Garden of Eden<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gender"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fumblings.com\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fumblings.com\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fumblings.com\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fumblings.com\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fumblings.com\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=27"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/fumblings.com\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":307,"href":"https:\/\/fumblings.com\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27\/revisions\/307"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fumblings.com\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=27"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fumblings.com\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=27"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fumblings.com\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=27"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}